Time and the Universe. The Math and Code of Time.

All Free, No Registration, No Ads, No Nothing (Isn't that something?). Read a thought, think a lifetime.

Theory updated: August 24, 2016.

Page index: | Theory | Universe Thoughts | My Other Sites |

To the best of my knowledge, I, Eleftherios Karagiannis (sounds like its spelled), created all the material on this website. No one else has any rights to it. I reserve all my rights under all laws. You may share if you agree to accept only thoughts in return. Copy, save, change if you wish.


No ads, cookies, pictures, texts, alerts, likes, spam, registration, etc, etc.

If any words are linked with popup ads, you have Adware. Not from this website, search on how to remove from your browser, if you choose.

This is not a business or for profit, I just like to learn and this helps my memory, which is not so good, except for some things, which is weird. Great, another question, I needed one more.

Don't believe just because someone tells you. Try to answer a question just to yourself.


Please read cautiously, I talk about eternity and other subjects that make me dizzy. When it does, I stop and do something, helping myself or another brings me back to reality, reminding me life is more than thinking. This is just my best understanding of what time is.

You have my permission to pick up where I left off and use any or all of my theory in your theory, you do not need my permission.


Back To Index

My Little Dirty Rag Theory


0+1=1. Is there an experiment that can change empty or none into an apple or can an apple only change into empty or none? Proven wrong.

1-1=0. Proven wrong. 1-1=2. In my theory.

2-1=1. Proven wrong. In my theory.

1/2=.5. Cut an apple in half. Measure it. Proven wrong, unless you can cut perfectly. Proven wrong. The correct equation is 1+1=2.

0*1=0. Why? There is nothing to multiply to begin with and where did the one come from? Proven wrong.

1*1=1. What is the definition of multiplication and where did the other one come from? Is 2*2=2? No. How do you get two without two ones? Proven wrong.

General Relativity. Imagine you are a grain of sand standing before the vast ocean. Apply General Relativity. What is affect? If light is time and I am traveling at time, how can time change? It cannot, unless I am time. Proven wrong.


In discovering the universe, science is disagreeing, many can defeat one, the only problem with facts, is not the number of times that it can be proven right, that number is irrelevant, the only relevant number is one, the one possibility that proves that fact wrong, the only problem with facts, one can defeat many, disagreeing is science, in discovering the universe.

Perception and reality, a difference, three in a room, each asks how many you see, answers the same, two, perception proves it, fact, proven in reality, in a room three, a difference, reality and perception.

One cell splits into two, what is the math equation? Zero plus two equals two, one plus one equals two, or one equals two?

Two cells, one enters the other, you can see the one cell inside the other, what is the math equation? Zero plus one equals one, one minus one equals zero, or two equals one? What about two minus one? That would prove only one cell left, not one inside the other. The difference between perception and reality.

Relativity. One plus one or one minus one. There are three relativities to consider, mine, outside the equation, and the two that are inside the equation. What happens in now to them is different than my relativity perceives to be happening; relativity creates different realities, the one viewing and the other two experiencing. Relativity changes math based on which perspective to consider, making the universe confusing. Now or time, is the relativity to consider if I want to understand it. The only way I can, so far, is to imagine now to be the same as my now, as if the universe is a body, and the cells inside me is a universe. This could be taking me down the wrong path, nature honestly tricking me once again. One of many she is best at.

One apple is on the table, what is the math equation? If eaten, at some instant of time the apple changes into empty or none, or one minus one. If I eat the apple, the problem with math is that the apple is literally, factually and in perception empty or none, but in reality, is still something and only changes. The universe cannot recycle empty or none and neither can me. To make better sense, the apple and I each are changed to one possibility. Every something in the universe can be described as one possibility, including time or now itself. In nature, possibilities split or merge, one into two, or two into one.

One possibility occupies one point in space and can split into two separate possibilities occupying two different points in space. The opposite can occur. Two possibilities occupying two different points in space can merge into one possibility occupying one point in space. There is also something that can prevent two possibilities from merging, a border or wall, or not possible. Is splitting always possible? An eternity of nothing would allow it.

What is the difference before an apple is eaten and after? My perception of the apple and my possibility has changed. The apple changes too, all the possibilities that make an apple separate and each change into a new one possibility, or many new one possibilities. If the apple is converted before it is eaten to all the possibilities that it will become, is it still an apple? No, it is not an apple anymore, but all the possibilities that happen after that change, could not be without it being an apple first. It depends what possibilities are being described and when. Can math describe it? Yes.

When and how can an apple subtract itself? It cannot. Another possibility subtracts the apple, like decay or me. Can a possibility subtract itself? I pull one hair from my body, that one hair is me, my DNA, in a separate point in space than me. My one possibility is now two. One minus one describes two possibilities, not one subtracting itself. Math describes change, in time, what was and will be, or what was and is, at different instants. It takes time to count or see change, a difference. The hair was subtracted from my one possibility, I am less one hair than before, or one minus one. Did the hair come from zero or me? Me. Is my one separate hair zero? No. One minus one equals two or one minus one equals not possible, in reality. What is the difference?

A cell can also split itself. A sperm has one DNA possibility. An egg has a different one DNA possibility. At some instant of time, there is an opposite equation, two equals one, at another instant or possibly the same, the new one possibility of the child, one equals two, two identical cells, or one cell multiplied, one DNA possibility, from two, change.

Building Blocks. At the exact instant of time that zero describes empty or none, does time exist anywhere in the universe or not at all? At that same instant, does one building block or any of the material to build one building block exist anywhere in any form in the universe? Or is the first building block empty or none, in other words, does not exist? If something does exist, can it be empty or none? I can see empty or none but can only describe what it is not, not what it is. Can anyone describe what it is?

Balance. One equals one. One minus one equals zero. Two different math equations that claim to describe balance. What is the difference or are they exactly the same? Both equations describe two possibilities and are exactly the same, no difference. Is balance one solution or two? It takes two to balance.

My records show I have one dollar in my bank account. The bank sends me a statement that shows one dollar. One equals one and one minus one equals zero. Two possibilities, no difference, balanced, zero is an answer and cannot have two different correct definitions. If I withdraw the one dollar, the banks math describes the one dollar I am physically holding in my hand as empty or none. If I give you the one dollar, my math describes the one dollar you are physically holding in your hand as empty or none. At no point in time is the one dollar empty or none. Empty or none is wrong.

One glass is on the table. It looks empty or none to my eyes. I can choose to describe it as no water, no orange juice, etc. Empty or none is right. The glass is full of air. Empty or none is wrong. As water is added to the glass, air is subtracted from the glass. As I drink the water, water is being subtracted from the glass and air is added to the glass.

Empty or none would be correct if math describes a point in space only. It does not. Math describes a possibility in a point in space, and thru times that possibility can be followed, measured and described by math at almost every possible instant, there is a point it does disappear, beyond our perception and measurements, but it does not change into nothing, but something else, possibly energy. Pick a possibility, pick a point of change, start before the change and follow it thru change and after.

An apple and I, both are possibilities, I eat the apple, math says minus the apple and it no longer exists, the apple however does exist and is added to me, the opposite of minus, the apple and I becoming one, relativity changing math to the opposite extreme, minus to adding and not possible from empty and none.

Is math numbers or letters? The formula for energy is letters and one number. An example of logic explaining what math describes. A code. Is physics math or code?

Is one plus one two trillion? According to math, I am one, and one trillion. The answer is in cells, the question is not. Without cells, am I still one? Math is right and fact, our application proven by the results, mostly, is our understanding of math complete or is there more to it?

I have a package that claims there are twelve eggs inside, I take the eggs out and count them, and the package is right. I have another twelve eggs in the fridge that I need to transport. The second twelve eggs from the fridge will not fit in the package because they are twice as big as the eggs before. Is the package wrong or math? Is math only fact if relative is applied or ignored? The fact is the possibilities changed. The second twelve eggs have met not possible. They need the original package they came in, that would be possible, if I did not throw that package away. Math is right; relative can change to not possible, only when the possibilities change. Different points in time.

Zero plus one equals one. Where did the one come from? Not possible plus one equals one. Where did the one come from? Not possible. What is not possible? Something not part of our perception, the unknown border of a circle, eternal Pi with a limit, the beginning and end, of now the wave called time.

Zero. My rag can have absolute no water. That would be zero; it just means the water is not in the rag, but somewhere else. Zero only works if I ignore the relativity of the water. Zero is balance, reality, with one possibility, now. Zero and one. Light is zero, balance, which is how the speed remains constant.


The Math of Time, the instant of change between what was and will be, described mathematically.

The math of merging, One minus one = one plus one.

The math of splitting, One plus one = one minus one.

The solution of math is one. The solution of logic is two. 2=2, balance in opposites.


The Code of Time.

One minus one = not possible.

Not possible plus one = possible, one possibility.

Beneath and above, after one possibility, now reaches not possible, if possible, next = time.

Not possible, if possible, next. That is the only way I can think to describe an event with a beginning and end over and over again. Is there another?


One is the minimum and maximum, and math describes what makes one. Relative makes a difference and less, equal or more than one, without it, there is only one. Math describes change, inside the one and the one as a whole. No matter what quantity in our reality, it is inside one universe. One plus one and one minus one describes two possibilities, when those two possibilities merge or split, we call it chance, probability, but I do not believe it is chance, or chance is something different. When I eat the apple, chance has nothing to do with it, the one and only possibility that can happen does, a different result would only occur if the one possibility we each are at each point in now is different, on a relative basis only. Chance should be in front of now, now is one possibility, too late for chance. Chance could determine what is possible and affect it after but before now. Or chance and affect is the same.

The smallest time difference is also the minimum between what different possibilities can exist, for each and every thing. As the time frame expands, more possibilities are added, and the only way to achieve all possibilities may be with eternity, but based on my relativity, all possibilities are limited. What can prove not possible exists?

A small rag I am using to clean can only hold so much water, that possibility is one, every smaller amount including none, is also possible, everything else is not possible, no matter what chance says. Examining the rag, if the smaller I look is eternal, possibilities have a limit and not possible does exist, even in eternity.

If I cut one apple in half, what has changed? The apple cannot be put together again, almost the same as cutting a magnet in half, the very outside has changed to not possible. Is not possible physical, possibly at the point gravity meets space or would it be the surface?

When examining something, the minimum is the smaller I look, eventually, not possible. The maximum is the larger I look, eventually, not possible.

Waves, from the macro to the micro, acting exactly the same, affecting in its wake, created by so many different things, including light, which appears constant, time is a wave between not possible, the maximum and minimum of one possibility. The future is two possibilities, the next point in time, and so on. The future does exist, only in possible possibilities, which can change, based on now. If nothing is there, time is flat, a straight line, and the fastest from point A to B. When something is there, time changes to a wave, from the minimum to maximum, the smaller the something is, the smaller the wave, and closer to the rate of now. The larger the something is, the larger the wave and the further from the rate of now. The rate of now stays the same, the wave of now changes and creates the difference between the perception of now, which is slower than the actual rate of now, based on the size of the wave. Speed does not affect the wave unless my size changes. Someone taller and smaller have different size now waves and perceive now different than me, ever so slightly. Only someone my exact size sees now the same as me.

A dust particle creates gravity, a warp in space so tiny, it may help explain how dust can coalesce at all, mix in one more, and gravity starts to grow, add enough to the point and it will explode, and a new star is born, an explosion with a maximum and minimum, after that, not possible takes over, creating a surface, the limit of a border, keeping the energy under its control. The energy eventually starts to run out, gravity collapses on itself, another explosion, not possible no longer in control, the border disappears, and the dust begins to travel, until it meets another possibility's not possible, putting an end to the dust's journey, and the affect and effect of a new journey begins. As an object grows, the maximum stretches space and the minimum is squeezed, the wave gets smaller and smaller until it is the same wave as the singularity and is released into space. What stops it could be the explosion, a change in gravity, or maybe a clotting like our skin, repairing the rip in space, not possible is the line of a border once again, limiting the eternal energy of the singularity itself.

Gravity. No matter how small, it is more than none, creating a warp in space. Gravity bends light, gravity is in and around the earth. Gravity changes the further down or further out I go. It is not static, gravity changes as the something it surrounds changes, with time. Based on an experiment with a little gnome, the further down I go, gravity is lessened, and a mountain creates more gravity than a valley, based on two satellites measuring gravity differences. Gravity is two percent less in low earth orbit than high earth orbit. If gravity is a wave, the smallest wave should be the least gravity and the largest the most. It appears the opposite is true, the smallest wave is the strongest and the largest is the weakest. Time in space is almost flat and at the point space meets gravity, the wave is the smallest and grows as it goes thru the earth and gets smaller again to the point of space being the smallest. Gravity is the wave of time pushing down on the earth trying to get flat again, to its fastest and balanced state. Gravity is a positive force from the relativity of space and time.

Time dilation. Our universe's now is shared by all the relativities within, and each relativity within has its own now based on its possibilities. Each now is different only relative to each other, not the universe. While on the earth, my now is relatively the same as the earth's now relative to the universe's now. When I leave the earth, the earth and my now are relative to the universe, not each other. Gravity causes time dilation, until I completely leave its affect. Relative to my point on the surface, one mile down or in a plane in the sky, my now is different than my point on the surface, because of gravity and our application of relative. The possibilities change. Imagine two cells in my body, their now's separate from each other and relative to my now. If one enters the other, the one inside is relatively the same as the other, relative to my now. A cell outside my body is not relative to my now until it is in my body. Gravity is the same as a cell entering a body, relative to time in possibilities. The atomic clocks difference is a measurement of change in gravity, the difference in the wave of time.

Space itself is the not possible and every something is a possibility opposite of it. The wave of now is smaller than a light wave and any wave smaller than light I cannot see. Not possible is more than just perception, it creates a limit. Every something's wave pattern is in the same direction, opposite space and time. The direction of the wave matters, like the pushing or pulling of magnetism, creating the border or wall that prevents two something's from going thru each other. I am stretching space, in the stretched space of the earth, and from the relativity of the universe, I am in the earth's body, the same as cells stretch space inside of me, possibilities can exist within each other. There is no math of nothing, empty or none. Math cannot describe it. It does not prove that nothing, empty or none is not part of the universe, only that math cannot describe it. If space is empty or none, time still exists there making space something, always.

If the universe has an end, what is on the other side? Not possible, after that, an eternal singularity that is now, dark energy. The big bang was a point in the eternal singularity, and possibly created a limited multiverse or an eternal multiverse each with limits.

If eternity has a starting point, eternity has a border, an end in the beginning, making eternity limited. Can eternity have a beginning or not? If balance is right, not that I can see, once again, maybe, logic is a funny thing. If opposites are true, balance should be balanced with imbalance, logically, right? Is it possible to have imbalance within balance when relative is applied, but remains balanced as a whole? Of course, there is another opposite, imbalance is balanced with balance. Which one, both are the same, or is it something else? Did I just enter circular logic? Break it down to possibilities and try again, I will save that for another day. Eternity makes me dizzy, the most.

Does Pi describe outside the circle? Imagine an eternity of nothing. Add one perfect circle. Inside the circle and the border each have limits, but outside the circle is still an eternity of nothing. Pi is describing eternity with a circle in it, borders within eternity. Eternity did not have a starting point, the circle did. What if I added a square instead of a circle? Never touching the inside of a border makes sense if that is possible, but the circle is not eternal, even though Pi claims that it may be.

Now is eternal, no begging or end, no borders, all possibilities possible, time should be stuck in eternity and change should not be possible. Not possible after minimum and maximum creates a beginning and end, borders, limited.

What could change the singularity into a bang? Without time, math and change, how can it be possible? One is an external affect. Any others?

If the big bang was the beginning of all, then math did not exist before, it was nothing, not a singularity, that would be one, proving math did exist before, and the big bang was not the beginning. The singularity still exists and is the source of energy and time for our universe. Math can describe energy, and therefore the singularity, more proof math existed before the big bang, unless that math equation or the solution is not possible. If I was frozen to the point my time stops, a border of not possible would stop change, but time still changes outside all around me, the same would happen if our universe was frozen, time exists outside of it, eventually, time affects all and change happens. Chance?

Time and math existed before our big bang; it would allow our big bang to have a beginning. Math and time also have a limit in our universe, time is possibilities, when there are none, there is no time like in our reality, time only exists in distance. Math has the limit of possible, math cannot solve not possible. Energy and math determine what is possible.

Each point in space can only be a maximum and minimum of one possibility, not possible is all around us, and looks like nothing. When I clap my hands, not possible is right in front of my eyes, between my hands, I hear the gravity around both my hands squeeze not possible, or the direction of the wave creates a wall and stops my hands going thru each other. Each relativity travels thru space differently based on its one possibility, which changes with time and affects. Gravity is where time dilation begins and is where possibilities begin its affects. Possibilities can also be affected in other ways, such as communication, experience, my own thought within myself and I can physically create and change possibilities as well.

Can nothing be considered one possibility? Nothing is eternal, because there are no borders, no different than Pi or eternity, in opposite, eternity with borders.

The relativity of my thought is my perception of now, my reality, light and distance, which is slower than the now of the universe, which is everywhere at once in or around nothing at every point, I can measure, experience and see points, and math proves them. How small makes a point? How big makes a point? What is the biggest smallest point or the smallest biggest point, does either make sense, or both? The biggest point is the universe or what all universes are inside which is one possibility, and the smallest point which is one possibility. The smallest point has size, otherwise size would be none. The smallest point is made of two, one of the two could exist in reality and the other not, or if they spin, they rotate into and out of reality, while one is in reality, the other is the opposite.

The astronaut traveling at light speed that returns in the future, the only possibility is to travel faster than light to sync their now with the earth. Not possible for mass, is now mass?

Is energy mass? If energy is now, no, because it is faster than light, if that fact is right. Now is faster than light because light takes time to get to us. If I was in a point in space with no light, time still exists, I change, and light is not change, light shows me the data of change. There is an all now, and what I see, is all now's history finally catching up to me. The past is what now was, and the future is what now will be.

The eternal singularity, dark energy, is the universe's now, which is faster than light, and all matter is bound to the limit of light, including our instruments and sight. Dark energy is now and distance, possibilities. Dark energy is negative, energy of mass is positive. Less than none is not possible in our reality. Negative only exists because we apply relative. Applied to dark energy gives the real existence of negative or opposite within our universe.

As our universe's possibilities play out, not possible or possibilities could be growing, expanding our universe faster. The expansion could reach not possible or all possibilities. What happens next?

Dark reality. One is always made of two, at a minimum, proven by balance and math, to name two. The singularity is energy that is straight, no borders, and eternal. Our reality, our perception, is split but still connected to the singularity, and our universe is still inside of it, surrounded by a circle of not possible, bigger and smaller. There is a line of not possible, a border, that separates our reality, and for a lack of any term I know, dark reality, or opposite. The opposite makes exactly one, between reality and dark reality; reality is four thirds, and only two possibilities exist, take one third from another or leave two thirds behind. I am guessing both, when I consume or absorb energy and two thirds behind because one is always made of at least two. Strings could be bouncing off not possible, being affected by dark reality; reality could also be affecting the strings, two points in the same instant of time. The strings could be circles between reality and dark reality, giving and taking possibilities. The symbol of eternity. ∞

Reality. Reality is four thirds, dark reality is two thirds. When something occupies space, only part of space is stretched and two thirds remains flat and remains in every something no matter where in space that something is. That is how time within every something remains the same, no matter how fast or slow it goes. The only way to travel at the rate of now is to be flat. Time itself is not exactly flat, it is energy wrapped around nothing, and time is the flattest and the fastest rate, the wave of now creates the difference in perception. The difference in perception between stopped and constant is change. If I could see at the rate of now, change would be observed, just slower, my wave of now would be the smallest; I still change the same because time has not changed. The size of my wave determines my perception of now, even light has a now, a wave larger than the fastest now, and possibilities that change. The speed I travel thru space does not change time. Like standing next to a moving train, as I speed up, my perception of the trains speed slows down, but not the train, it stays the same speed and in no way does the train change, just me. On the earth, I have the earth's speed that she travels thru space as zero or stopped, she is not. Everything in space remains relatively the same speed for a very long time. When I leave the earth, everything is not changing, just me. They are like fans all along the track cheering me on, standing and clapping. As I speed up, everything gets more blurry, and my perception is only tricking me.

What is the rate of now? If the calculation of the astronaut traveling at light speed is correct, how much faster to sync their now, should be the rate of now, but speed relies on relative, creating it depends; without it, possibilities are left. If time was frozen, what would be is the one possibility, of each and every thing.

Time travel would be before or after now, which does not exist, now is eternal and unless you can pass eternity, there is only now, the past is written in light, the future in possibilities, previous or fast forward does not appear to be part of the code, making now move only forward, one possibility at a time, maybe, maybe not, either way, one of those four is right. Now is faster than my perception, the speed of light, the limit for mass, which I am. The wave of all mass is bigger than a light wave, creating the limit.

Black Holes. Time changing in a black hole is the same as time changing in water, it does not. Gravity is changing in a black hole, not time. Time in a black hole is the same as time outside of it. Gravity is a warp in space and gravity in a black hole is warping everything inside of it, including light. The slowest I can travel is stopped, the fastest is light, limits, faster still is time, as long as I am at the rate of now or slower, time does not change, just the rate I travel thru space, relative to now, stopped or something else. The wave in a black hole is small, being squeezed to the point that we cannot see light; the wave is smaller than a light wave. A black hole is spinning faster than light but slower than now, the smaller the wave the closer to the rate of time or now. If the wave is squeezed to the same wave as the singularity, the singularity is released into space, temporarily.

Quantum entanglement is a connection thru empty or none in dark reality; it does not happen all the time because dark reality is not always empty, or is not possible until it is, it disappears because it is now, light is slower, and disappears right before my eyes. The changing of the answer could be because the universe does not stop changing and time could be one instance faster than our perception, or more. The collapsing of a wave when viewed may be because I can only view one point of the wave and not the whole wave itself. When I see a light wave, I can only see part of the wave at once, the wave is still there and does not collapse, until I try to see the part of the wave that I cannot. Quantum entanglement could flow one way and the opposite in dark reality. Magnetism could show the path to connection.

Force, I am pushing you and you I, both our forces are positive. If pushing or moving forward is a positive force and pulling or moving backward is a negative force and I turn my back to you and pull while you are pushing, you are a positive force moving forward and I am a negative force moving forward. Pulling is a positive force, more than none, I cannot produce less than none force. Whether pushing, pulling, forward or backward, my force is always positive. If you push me against a wall, when I hit the wall, my force is positive. I can never hit a wall with negative force, no matter what, even if I pull that wall apart. One table, two people on opposite sides, you and I, and one object in the middle. I push and pull it back to the middle. You pull and push it back to the middle. The force is the same; the only difference is the perception, which is not a force at all. If I am pushing you with ten pounds of force and you are pushing me with twelve pounds of force, I am minus two and you are plus two. That only describes the difference, not what we are. If I am pulling you with ten pounds of force and you are pushing me with one pound of force, am I a negative or positive force? Oops. There is no such thing as negative force, less than none, only positive, more than none, at least in our reality.

Big Bang. To have balance, an explosion would have to have a maximum and minimum. Not possible allows balance to happen. If the Big Bang is right, the maximum will continue for eternity and the minimum would eventually collide into itself, no balance. Balance exists in reality. Is the big bang right? The minimum would squeeze the wave to the same as the singularity, eventually, the singularity would be let out. A black hole is far smaller than the universe and can create the same wave as the singularity, if the big bang is right, there would only be a singularity and nothing else. There could not be a wave bigger than the singularity. I believe the big bang is wrong. If there was a big bang, it is the point in eternity that energy separated and surrounded nothing, energy created when there was none before, not at a single point in space, but at the same instant in all eternity and at every possible point in eternity. Energy and nothing are opposites that create one possibility, time as it is today. Time existed before the big bang in the eternal distance of nothing, and the big bang is the one possibility in eternity that took time to become possible, before time was more than distance like today. Knowledge takes time to learn, like DNA.

What does algebra describe? The answer can be positive or negative, and less than none does not exist in our reality. I cannot think of anything negative, less than none, in reality when relative is not applied. Unless it is debt. The negative in algebra could be describing the part of the universe we do not see. Considering nature only, nothing human made, is the negative the wrong answer? It is possible that negative only exists because of relative and less than none does not exist in the universe. Does nature apply algebra?

Magnetism. There is only one kind of magnetism, one we cannot measure, energy that is faster than light, but can measure its effects, and the other, the slower energy, electromagnetism. In reality, both are the same. Two separate parts of the universe, dark reality and reality, one possibility that proves both. Magnetism is space and time, the two points in time, two circles of energy wrapped around nothing, or one circle twisted and bent and the stretching and squeezing of space changes the shapes in nothing between each point, the same made different based on the shape and nothing is time in distance. It also is how two things cannot go thru each other. The same force in opposite directions eventually flowing in one direction, and that one direction is the moving forward of time.

The point that is believed the big bang occurred is actually a point of magnetism. We are being pushed from that point, including light, and if we could see beyond that point, we would see objects pulled to that point, explaining how everything is coming from that point. The furthest image that is seen is all the objects ripped apart when they entered that point. An explanation that solves eternity was once a single point, making eternity limited, which proves itself wrong. True eternity has no borders, like nothing. The point of magnetism is the strongest, or the fastest, the further away it weakens, or slows until it turns back to the point. It is the same as a tiny magnet on my kitchen table. The pulling side speeds up as it gets closer to the point. The pushing is the strongest at the point and weakens further away to the point of stop. It is possible we are being pulled to a different point of magnetism or will eventually be pulled back to the original point. The furthest image seen is not the beginning, but faster than light past that point. We are traveling slower than light thru space, the light that is at the point of the big bang should have passed us and should not be there, only emptiness. The fact that the light is just getting to us, proves the big bang wrong.

The big and the small work exactly the same, same math, same rules, and the same universe. The difference is knowledge and understanding.

To have understanding, one would have to understand everything, logically speaking. Not eternal wealth or a prize can give me that, that can only be learned within oneself, if it is possible at all. The best chance is true science.

Is one plus one two? I have two apples, according to math they are exactly the same in every way, reality proves that wrong. To even have that equation, relative must be applied. Ignoring relative proves itself wrong. Nature is hiding another secret. There is balance in math. There are far more secrets to earn, in simple thoughts and acts. My path needs to change, other goals I hope to accomplish. There are many true scientists better than me, too many to count. You can do it, and I have faith in you.

One plus one or one minus one is math, equal to all others, logically. Who discovered those? Without them, math would be possible but not exist, in our reality.

If I am right about even one thing I am blaming time, trying and chance.


How can math be wrong? One two pound object plus a two pound object equals two objects. One two pound object plus a ten pound object equals two objects. Math is right, am I asking math the right questions?

Math tells the truth, but can be deceiving. If you buy a stock at ten dollars and it drops to one dollar and then goes up to two, all the news is about the one hundred percent rise.

If anything is possible, then not possible possibly exists. Would that make a possibility possibly not possible or not possible probably not probable?

Is one minus one nothing? I have two apples, I eat one by one, math appears right, because now there are none. When I use thought and look deep inside, the two apples are still there, is math still right, only because the apples, are out of my sight?

A sperm enters an egg, one cell multiplied suddenly appears, and billions are added, until there are about a trillion individual cells. Science can tell us the process, first this and then that, like the universe itself, an eternal miracle, me, you and everything else.


Back To Index

Universe - Some thoughts I think about.

Only space time is expanding and not me? Is space time not inside or a part of me?

Are there equations that change energy into matter and matter into energy?

Everything is speeding up in the universe, if the speed of light is constant, everything would look very different than it does. Is the speed of light constant? The speed of light is the balanced point, making the speed of light constant.

Life is a simulation. Life is like a simulation and we have no understanding of it. Be careful what you say, some believe without question, a religion.

Affect, change occurs, contemplating what just happened, an effect in return, once again, change occurs, affect. The effect of magnetism moves an object from its previous point in space. Different points in space are different possibilities, change. Is magnetism an effect or affect, or is it, it depends?

Where is the subconscious? It controls the life inside of us, all of it, their own thoughts is our subconscious, they are aware and act on their own, not controlled by any other, they do not need our consciousness, and we need their thoughts. Based on a experiment, it is how mother trees feed their saplings, trees are made of cells, the motherly instinct is the subconscious of the tree, and plants are aware of their surroundings.

Quantum coherence, the quickest path is the smallest wave above not possible, proving not possible just below, if not possible is not there, the quickest path would be quicker. Or the light wave is squeezed or cut to the smallest wave possible.

0+1=1, empty or none changing into one has never been proven, not once, the basis of a scientific fact, and any questions answered based on the basis of that scientific fact, should bring into question everything based on it, including 1-1=0, one changing into empty or none. The basis of a misunderstanding of what math describes and believing perception by ignoring relative when it should not, scientists try their best, everything right with that, they have more to learn, like me and you. Filling a glass with water is the same as me drinking the water, mathematically speaking. Questions should be based on the answers of facts that have been proven, sometimes simply by observing the best laboratory of them all, simply by listening to the story that nature desperately wants to tell, one cell splits into two, 1=2, I eat an apple, 2=1, based on the fact that both can be scientifically factually proven, questions should be based on the answers of proven facts, if not, then the questions should try to prove that fact wrong, the best chance is to think of all the possibilities that I can, my brain may be limited but nature appears to be trying to help, ridiculous questions and answers, thinking is the cheapest most powerful thought processor on the planet, simply in thoughts from the worst to the best with no act, add the learning that requires acts, caution until understanding is to try our best, all lead to the right true path, knowledge and understanding of self to all in the universe to the end of no questions left and beyond, the true path of true science. Try to learn something new and proving facts wrong may seem to be not possible, until I do. Chance is trying.

Philosophers only ask questions, scientists do that with answers, wrong or right is not part of the basis, trying is the only key for change, answers the question philosopher, and suddenly, you are a scientist, the same.

Defining true science, the stronger the fact, the stronger the desire, not knowing everything is the dangling of a fruit, a wrong must be hidden by the possibility of unknown, once in all, hiding in nature beyond the seeing eyes, chance and time combined playing their role, every possibility that can possibly be thought of, one by one, fact or fiction, the mind of a true scientist, not believing what is written, made worse with the worthless prizes attached to toilet paper, the opposite making better, morality the limit on the desire for learning, help or harm, the basis for true intention, before any action failure is irrelevant, fact, it is the instant a wrong has finally been discovered, wrong and right, logically added to the whole of knowledge, trying to prove what is written wrong, need the one possibility, limiting the wrong eternal limitless desire for knowledge before any truth in understanding, the wanting versus needing, true science defining.

My comment is no comment. Something that is that cannot be, being something that it cannot, circular logic. It proves nothing, proving what it is, if nothing could be, in perception, sometimes it is.

What does sound tell us about the universe?

Which is more intelligent, math or logic?

For one thing to be everywhere at once, eternity could only fit one thing. There is more than one thing in the universe, proving it wrong, unless there is a part of the universe that everything cannot go, except for one thing. Time?

I read an article, a scientific argument, two different ideas in debate, I remember ioptic, searched it and cannot find it, and in any case, here it is, basically. Two graphs each with two bell curves. In the one graph, the two bell curves are separate and not touch each other, in the other graph, there is some overlap. The argument is that only one can be right, to me, I see both in reality. The first, two possibilities that do not affect each other, directly, the other is when two possibilities do. That is all I that I remember, for now. Maybe chance will play, and help me along the way.

Not possible being the faster than light part of the big bang does not explain not possible inside of it, probably defies it, unless we are being stretched, we are slower, again defies it. Not possible has become possible, I was possibly wrong.

If the universe was a trillion years old, could science prove it? Change says not yet, a whole lot of knowledge would have to be learned, a detective story like no other, and the longer we wait, the harder it gets. Of course, there is always time travel. If time travel is true, do not do anything, it already is done, should we try and see what happens, what could go wrong?

The experiment that splits light into two, the earth is not still, she emits waves, are we hearing the earth in light? Gravity bends light, gravity waves.

Video is sped up to see change, the minimum, how much faster before change becomes a blur, the maximum?

Why is DNA letters and not numbers, or the one solution of math?

When I was a teenager, I went thru a growth spurt, I did not consume that much more energy to justify that growth spurt, where did the extra growth come from?

A point on the surface of an egg is different points in space, different possibilities, chance is at what point the entry is, and the one possibility could be calculated on the surface, like the beginning of gravity. DNA is unique, can split, and create multiple possibilities from one, the only difference between twins is possibilities, and the points in space they occupy. How can the same exact cell change itself into two separate possibilities?

Quantum entanglement is a connection with dark energy, the opposite, negative. I do not know why it vanishes when viewed. Faster than light?

It is believed that sterile neutrinos have no electrical charge but decay; how can decay occur without an electrical charge, or are they giving and taking the charge from the neutrinos?

The color I see is the light bounced back at me, the rest is absorbed, where does it go?

If light slows when it is in water, if reflected back out of the water, would the speed stay at the slower rate, or does it speed back up to the maximum?

If the constant speed of light is sped up or slowed down, what would I see? What is the speed of light in water, does it slow down when it bends, it is not a straight line, is friction created?

Math is fact, as long as the solution is one, the consideration of more, cannot be done, logic searches the one solution, by considering all of them, along the way, even math can be argued, facts suddenly seem confusing, the one solution, appears to be many.

Saturn, clouds in motion, round they go, the same as seen on so many the same, stop and look at the top, the thirty year storm of a hexagon. How can clouds or air do that?

If gravity bends light in space, does gravity bend light on the earth?

Photons repeat the data of eternity. Photons repeat limited data. Which makes more sense, based on reality?

Nothing does not exist. Is it possible that there is only something, everywhere?

The earth is oblong, is the sun? A perfect sphere would send light in every possible direction, what affect would oblong have, if any?

We are from the same, made the same, are the same, and different. Is it the possibilities, fractals and affects? What else?

Could what is on the bottom be traveling at the speed of light? Light looks constant to us, so should they. Is it because of the big bang, the very outside and inside is the speed of light?

Is a black hole anti matter?

Does a chart of diminishing returns match the point of no return in a black hole?

If matter and anti matter combined produces energy, could a black hole be doing that? When the coalesced dust produces gravity, could it force matter and anti matter to combine, sparking a sun and a black hole at the core?

There is no dark matter in the sun. Dark matter is a mystery, but it is known not to be in the sun?

Do negative numbers only exist because we apply relative? According to my reality, less than none is not possible. Dark energy and dark matter?

No matter what the energy source, is light created exactly the same or is the speed the only similarity? Does light tell us that energy is like water, the same can exist in different states?

Is the universe perfect? Perfection does not change, if it did, it would be imperfect, and without change, there is no experience, and without experience, there is no knowledge, and without knowledge, could there be life?

Between two different some things, there appears to be empty space, the atoms do not touch, the closer they get, they push each other away. In this space, does time move the fastest? The barrier is broken, one atom for one reason or another, changes sides, and both some things are changed forever, are waves created and what are the other affects?

Static energy, ball and sprite, different cloud types producing an electric strike, the power that might spark a sun or life, waves of bright light, in space and on planets, the power of the universe, energy static.

Planets change, even when rogue, they pick up dust, particles, other leftovers, at times given and others times stole, and meteoroids when big enough, explode, there may be times when gravity causes spherical perfection, the affect of others and another story is told.

Perfect sphere, oblong caused by gravity of another, on its own, if it was all alone, would gravity cause oblong or a perfect sphere?

Is it the more decimal places the more balanced and eternity is the most balanced? Is the quickest path the solution that takes the longest?

Two circles, each imperfect, combined they achieve eternal Pi, perfection in balance, is it perfection making imperfection or imperfection making perfection with balance? Can eternity only be achieved with balance?

If two different objects are exactly the same in every way, then one plus one is two. If one is more or less at least in one way, then the other must be the exact opposite, creating balance to math, as if each object is exactly the same, is that how math and nature works?

Quantum coherence, based on studies, it appears nature has applied it for the benefit of life, the transfer of light to energy, found in bacteria and algae, low light into a fine dinner and wine, as quick as possible can possibly allow it, all chances rolled into one. Could quantum coherence be occurring in me? If chance or randomness was in play, the quickest path would eventually be wrong, not how it works, apparently, it is written or known by the universe, the definition of what the quickest path is, a set of rules that can only result in one, the quickest path, does chance even play a role?

A quantum computer can only solve a problem that has a solution, how can Pi exist unless the universe can solve it or does a perfect circle not exist and neither does an eternal Pi?

If the universe is expanding, then so am I, and if the universe is expanding faster than me, then I am expanding relative to my previous self, and shrinking relative to the universe. Is there anything shrinking relative to me? (Besides my brain)

Does Pi prove eternity?

Life can be found deep in the earth, could life have started there and not in the oceans? If life was brought by a meteorite, would that life survive the early earth's violent surface of constant bombardment, or the relative safety of deep down below?

The moons of our solar system, what science thought, can change, the small is powerful, enough to change a world.

Does it appear that when we understand we had nature wrong, it is not by a little bit, but the extreme of the opposite? Is it because there is not one answer to balance, but two?

Is the relativity of time the same for each of us and each of our relativity of time different? If so, would time be the smallest, the biggest, or somewhere in the middle?

Light enters the water and bends; the photon only goes down so deep then changes. What affects the photons to change and what happens to them next?

The universe, a singularity smaller than an atom, distances so small, but still exist, the big bang and the universe expands, are distances being added or stretched?

Is nothing distances making nothing something or are distances nothing?

Does distance always exist in nothing or is distance created as something travels thru nothing? Is distance created or just revealed?

Time is none, zero becomes one, beginning of time exists, or time always is?

A fractal, an image of the same object, over and over again, from bigger to smaller, it is the same picture, creating another completely different, made with the help of math, and from the math comes beauty, an image equally seen, in nature.

The past is known, the future is unknown, is now the perfect balance, reality?

Quantum physics, the ability of one thing, to be everywhere at once. Time, changed by relativity, if I was so small, would everywhere at once, be different points in time?

Past, now, future, change, relativity, distance, possibility, probability, absolutes, temperature, mass, gravity, energy, waves, to name a few. Some affect, others affected, eventually, time affects all, whatever that is.

H two O, making exactly the same water, a liquid, a gas and a solid, and now, hydroxide ions (bonded oxygen and hydrogen atoms), it depends.

If the future has a size or length, it is exactly the same as the past, at least until now.

If I was frozen, I stop changing and my now is stopped, but now moves on. If I am un-frozen, my now is not at the point that I was frozen, but the now of all space itself. It appears now and change is or can be separate. If the singularity was frozen, would the now of all space stop, or move on?

One plus one is two, if one is slightly less or more than the other is the answer still two? Whatever the answer, the universe knows how to make it work.

I remember an old science show, a scientist sneezed on an instrument sent to the moon, on its return, it was thought it originated from the moon, when it was realized what really happened, it was viewed under a microscope, and life came alive, proving life can survive completely exposed to the harshness of space.

Three suns over Russia, caused by ice crystals in the atmosphere, proving that light can be deceiving, and don't believe everything I see.

Is chance an unforeseen or unknown affect and that is where possibility begins? If dice were rolled exactly the same, in every way, would the outcome change? Is a mutation a result of chance or an affect? Is no snowflake the same because at each point where one is created, each is affected differently than at any other point? Is chance and affect the same?

In an infinite universe, is our singularity the only one? Possibility says no, there may be more. If our singularity will expand for eternity, what happens if a something from our singularity, affects another? A big bang?

If nothing turns into something and/or something turns into nothing, what does it prove? Eternity?

The past exists with now, only seen in light, the future exists with now, the delay of my perception, take my perception away, what has changed?

Is the universe absolutes or possibility and chance? One plus one is two, an absolute, proving possibility and chance do not exist, and that the future can be predicted. If possibility and chance do exist, then one plus one is not always two, proving math can be wrong, and the future cannot be predicted. Which is it?

Do the questions of what was before the beginning, and what happens after the end, prove eternity?

All the past, had to happen exactly that way, otherwise now would be different, at least in one way, would I still be here, in this now, or another?

As time moves, the past grows in distance, relative to now; does the future change or stay the same?

Does nature apply opportunity cost, or does she work only in chance? The rule of possibility is given enough time, every possibility eventually, will happen. Did possibility exist before the big bang, if so, did time?

What would the relativity of now be like? Is there anything that does not have a now, nothing?

Are there two times, now and distance, and distance only exists because of relativity, and now, if it is everywhere at once, has nothing to do with distance?

I saw an experiment testing the gravitational pull one mile down in the earth. Gravity is lessened, the further down I go. Did the singularity not have gravity, because it was so small?

Based on the theory of how planets are formed, why are there no planets in the asteroid belt? The gravity of Jupiter is what is taught, but what about when the asteroids are opposite of Jupiter and not affected by its gravity?

Does time, or now, put a limit of all possibilities to just one? Between time and chance, which one wins the outcome?

When a photon hits my eye, does the photon enter my brain or is data only exchanged, and the photon bounces away, with the data of my eye?

When a photon leaves the sun, it carries data of the sun, but when it bounces off the moon, the data has changed and I see the moon. Could the corruption of data be because two photons affected each other, as if hitting another object and their data has changed?

What was the first star made of, is it the same material as today or have stars evolved?

I eat to create energy, which is used in many ways, one of which is growth. Do cells change growing into splitting instead?

Is gravity created evenly or does it fluctuate?

Could gravity be shrinking and stretching space creating energy, possibly by affecting the atoms into splitting or fusing, and that sparks a sun?

Two points in space. Assume now does not exist, but time still does in distance between the two points. Did now need possibility and probability too?

If this then that, exactly looped exactly, and then it is not, in a direct or indirect way, chance was always in play. How does chance do that?

Does chance play a role in what is possible or can chance only play if possible will allow it?

If I can imagine the relativity of an ant, can I imagine the relativity of time?

When I see a spectrum of light, is there distinct lines separating the colors, or is there a gradual change from one color to the next? Could now work like that?

When we see a large cloud of dust and a black disk with a new born sun inside, it appears ready to start making planets and maybe more suns. There is no galaxy, no black hole in the middle, is that still yet to come?

Does evolution have a rate and does it fluctuate?

The larger we look, infinity appears possible, the smaller we look, infinity appears possible, are there possibly two infinities and we are somewhere in the middle, or possibly just one?

When something is created in an instant, is an instant a point in time or no time?

Based on my relativity, an ant travels at about one mile per hour. Based on the ant's relativity, some travel at about sixty miles per hour. Assuming both our now's are the same and we switched relativities, does the speed of light change or stay the same for me?

Sometimes in nature, one equals two. What kind of math is that?

As things change, so do answers, does math stay the same, even with possibility and probability?

Did evolution exist in the singularity or is evolution only applied to life?

What is the opposite of time? Could time and nothing be spinning opposite each other in every something creating now?

What is change? Is the change in now the same as the change in the sun or myself? Is now change, affect change or is separate? What about gold and diamonds, or other objects that don't appear to change, how do they fit?

Is relativity only important when we travel slower than now? If we could travel at now, is relativity still relevant?

Best Guess: Nothing looks like nothing, because we can't see faster than light. If nothing is time and faster than light, it should look like nothing to us. Is that why a black hole looks like nothing, is it spinning faster than light?

Best Guess: Like so much in nature, opposites exist together to form one. Eternity in distance and eternity in time, is wrapped together in nothing, and exist as one.

If light can only exist at a slower rate than now, is other something's restricted by different rates of time, which could create an effect of a floor and a ceiling? Could this cause spinning in quantum physics?

If now is change, why does change appear so slow? Why do we have to speed up a camera to see change?

Does light have a now, a connection to now just like everything else?

Best guess: If time does not exist in nothing and only in something, the fastest rate of now could exist in the smallest point of quantum physics, just above nothing. The rate of time or now is affected by what that something is, but the fastest rate of now remains in every something, at every state that something can possibly be. Could a black hole come close to allowing time to touch where no time exists, or different rates of time, creating a burst of energy?

Best guess: If opposites are true, than nothing is the opposite of something and nothing is in the universe. If eternity exists, then time is stopped or does not exist, and that possibly is what nothing is.

Best guess: Light is part of something, and like every something, can never be the same thing as nothing, that's why light and time are not the same. Time can exist thru or is nothing.

Best guess: The fastest rate of time, now, is fastest in, with or passing thru nothing. Nothing and time exist together in every something somehow, and that is how every something's now stays the same.

Can a rock floating in space ten trillion miles away affect me? Yes. Thought, which opens new possibilities and chances. Maybe nothing, maybe something, only future now and chances upon chances will tell.

When an event happens in now, is light created instantly in the same now, or does it take time for light to be created?

Do I think in now or just after now? If you touch me, the touch occurs in now. But my thought will never know until after now, because my thought is connected to all my senses, which take time after now to reach my thought. Thought occurs in now, but can only think of now's past. Thought that occurs without my senses, is that thought in now?

Is now the same rate as change and change creates light? If one element in me decays faster than another in me, is my rate of change two different rates or just one?

If there is only now, then the past is what now was, and the future is what now will be.

Is time and nothing independent of everything? Every something can affect another something in different ways, but is every something affected by time equally?

Without nothing, where would everything go?

Is there an all now, and what I see, is all now's history finally catching up to me?

If something occupies nothing, is nothing still there?

Can a black hole create a new galaxy and that is why they are in the center of almost every one, or is the galaxy creating the black hole?

Is a black hole a converter of everything into energy? What could force energy out from such intense gravity, or is energy successful in its escape?

Is light showing me what time would if time could?

If light isn't there, does time still exist there?

If I can see nothing, which would better explain it, math or logic?

My full understanding of math for physics: Nothing plus something equals everything.

Could there be infinity of nothing?

Could there be dark space because light can't get thru, or is it really nothing?

I like to think about nothing. Nothing fascinates me.

If infinity was once a single point, wouldn't that make infinity finite?

If space is nothing, it shouldn't exist, logically speaking.

Either the universe has always existed or was created. Either one confuses me, scientifically speaking.


I did not knowingly use anyone else's material. Sometimes, I can't remember if I thought it, read it or heard it. If it's yours, I sincerely apologize and will make the correction as soon as I know.


My Other Sites

Back To Index

www.karagianniseleftherios.org Nice Thoughts, All Free, No Registration, No Ads, No Nothing (Isn't that something?) Read a thought, think a lifetime.

www.eleftherioskaragiannis.org My original music, I play guitar. Free to play, Free to download. No Registration, No Ads.

www.karagianniseleftherios.com Not so nice thoughts, other issues, politics. All Free, No Registration, No Ads, No Nothing (Isn't that something?) Read a thought, think a lifetime.


Every view, or chance, started with a special few, and only because of all of you, I am obligated to yell, THANK YOU!

Have fun and enjoy the beauty all around us. When needed, you have thought.


Don't believe just because someone tells you. Try to answer a question just to yourself.

Best wishes to you all!


Send me an email: info@eleftherioskaragiannis.org

Privacy Policy: I will not share or give your email address or anything else. It's a private conversation (as far as I'm concerned) between us and only us.